The Prompt

I am an SLP organizing evaluation data into a structured report. Here are my raw findings (no identifying information). My data includes: referral reason, relevant history, assessment tools administered, scores and observations by area, and any notable behaviors during testing. Organize this information into the following sections: Reason for Referral, Relevant History, Assessment Procedures (list of tools administered), Results by Area (group findings by domain: receptive language, expressive language, articulation, fluency, voice, etc.), Clinical Impressions (leave as a placeholder for me to complete), and Recommendations (leave as a placeholder for me to complete). Do not interpret scores or assign severity levels. Present the data as I recorded it. Do not invent history or findings I did not provide. Maintain my clinical terminology.

What to include in your raw findings

• Referral reason — who referred and why
• Relevant history — medical, developmental, educational, or therapeutic background
• Assessment tools — names of tests administered, subtests used
• Scores — standard scores, percentile ranks, age equivalents as recorded
• Observations — testing behavior, engagement, notable responses, language samples

Why This Works

• Separates organization from interpretation. The model structures data while the clinician retains all diagnostic reasoning.
• Explicit placeholders. Clinical Impressions and Recommendations are left for the clinician, preventing the model from generating diagnostic conclusions.
• Hard boundary on scores. “Do not interpret scores or assign severity” stops the model from converting standard scores into clinical labels.
• Domain grouping. Organizing results by area mirrors standard evaluation report formats across settings.
• Terminology preservation. “Maintain my clinical terminology” prevents the model from substituting its own phrasing.

When to Use

Use when you have completed an evaluation and have raw data (test scores, observations, case history notes) that need to be organized into a formal report structure. Particularly useful when you are managing multiple evaluations and need to reduce formatting time.

When NOT to Use

• Do not paste data containing client names, dates of birth, or facility names
• Do not rely on the model to interpret scores; that is your clinical responsibility
• Do not use the placeholders as-is in a final report; fill them in yourself

Pair With

• PHI Safety Checker – de-identify before pasting
• Parent-Friendly Evaluation Summary – translate the finished report for families
• Documentation task guide – full evaluation workflow